[Website patch] Announcing the Guix user survey - blog post

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
3 participants
  • Christopher Baines
  • pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Steve George
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Steve George
Severity
normal
S
S
Steve George wrote on 10 Nov 13:00 +0100
(address . guix-patches@gnu.org)
bb0f4c02-5107-4ef6-9268-4748eae0d156@futurile.net
Hi,

I've finished designing the Guix user and contributor survey that was
discussed on guix-devel.

I've announced it on IRC as a 'soft launch' so that everyone can find
whatever spelling mistakes I've made!

Attached is a blog post for the Guix blog. Can someone add it for me please?

Thanks,

Steve / Futurile
title: Take the Guix User and Contributor Survey
slug: guix-user-contributor-survey-2024
date: 2024-11-10 10:01:00
author: Steve George
tags: Community
---

To understand the views of the Guix community we're running a survey that we'd
love **you** to take part in! The
[Guix User and Contributor Survey](https://guix.limesurvey.net/216541)is live
now, and should take about 10 minutes to fill out. Perfect for doing with a cup
of tea and a biscuit!

The Guix project continues to grow and change, with new contributors and users
joining our community. We decided to run this survey as it's the best way to
gather good quality feedback across the widest cross-section of the community.
Of course, there's lots of interesting topics a survey could ask about! We
decided to focus on how Guix is used, and how contributors take part in the
project.

The survey is being run on
[LimeSurvey](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LimeSurvey)which is a Free Software
project and has been used by many other projects for similar surveys. The
survey's hosted on the [LimeSurvey SaaS](https://www.limesurvey.org/)so that we
don't have the additional task of operating the software. No personal data is
asked for (e.g. email addresses), no tracking data is being
collected (e.g. IP addresses) and the entries are anonymised.

We'll be making the results and the anonymised data available under the
that way anyone can analyse the data for further insights.

We hope the results of the survey will be used to understand both the Guix
project's strengths and areas we can improve. Which is why your input is
so important. If you can, please take the survey!

P
P
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote on 10 Nov 15:01 +0100
(name . Steve George)(address . steve@futurile.net)(address . 74291@debbugs.gnu.org)
87zfm7mblb.fsf@pelzflorian.de
Steve George <steve@futurile.net> writes:
Toggle quote (2 lines)
> Attached is a blog post for the Guix blog. Can someone add it for me please?

If someone adds this:

Could the person adding the blog post also do a pull+reconfigure?

Presumably the website updates are still blocked until the website
server (is that bayfront?) gets reconfigured, because Guix commit
e99f7b8abcfab260fafcb353cbd6904c0e3aafb7 made an incompatible change
that broke the website, therefore I pushed to guix-artwork a fix
ce25c1ad7c0db77c729b1821b295c5aea021a959, but my fix breaks when the
server does not yet have
e99f7b8abcfab260fafcb353cbd6904c0e3aafb7.

Regards,
Florian
C
C
Christopher Baines wrote on 11 Nov 10:14 +0100
(name . pelzflorian (Florian Pelz))(address . pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de)
87ed3irv2b.fsf@cbaines.net
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de> writes:

Toggle quote (15 lines)
> Steve George <steve@futurile.net> writes:
>> Attached is a blog post for the Guix blog. Can someone add it for me please?
>
> If someone adds this:
>
> Could the person adding the blog post also do a pull+reconfigure?
>
> Presumably the website updates are still blocked until the website
> server (is that bayfront?) gets reconfigured, because Guix commit
> e99f7b8abcfab260fafcb353cbd6904c0e3aafb7 made an incompatible change
> that broke the website, therefore I pushed to guix-artwork a fix
> ce25c1ad7c0db77c729b1821b295c5aea021a959, but my fix breaks when the
> server does not yet have
> e99f7b8abcfab260fafcb353cbd6904c0e3aafb7.

I've pushed the blog post to guix-artwork now. I also reconfigured
bayfront yesterday with commit aa2ccd6350caa094519c41f547f1d0fa68ab29ac.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmcxyvxfFIAAAAAALgAo
aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF
ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh
aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9XcI7RAAoWDOgDxDSgqNRlnaqKyiDPWs5/EKfkw3
GSfVGjoUOB4wT6Rs+IRsB1yIhb/fEqn8luVCerVOyT1lFdqOzjZi5ZhY8TzNzch6
ZutMA8/py6+Mv5ej3zLZj/jvdoWWcrf4/8b3KDId0hc3wfmvsYo/psGu+NkyxSqG
d/3645hRz7QO/xKfCirGthENLUXa4HHDwHwnwRep7jBvx/pVFBgSsJm0WRMDFpUE
WSCR+uDUhani554B2dg7TwNKrmAPlS7HRCck2OrIpiOGaBAwF+0B4gK7HSVjMw60
weKdnFXUTNIvJZt9jpG021CsqU/qOWrZQfCo8BiLgGDWlImcxpes9I6axW5D6AZt
d3cSgutAs8UcyOO5MzgTgTtgMaJGAuALplffRaKvmzfK2kKBKTtpsJJreQ1ftgxQ
wxJfi2CtauTcffRYvuKtXPStN0HmXfxD5179oNsJoUUxAVkwClr81sy4dZBbAdXi
woRdU21JEMUv4m+zfrgBdNt9l8Jt/OnEXg0YQUs7Elhql/VfUZpSX2X8pJCrw61j
oT39H5GHTcZdO3fT/dEm6djbzv45/Y5UW9oq8v4BfP5lT0kPn7o5E2lMonayWpg/
lw6ljM4iaUfbNV92bfUksgCtRSaVXaKGO0shg1B+tOKRnwsiZjaQoB9/rYqHSf3F
nq7sNzOrt+g=
=F//G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Closed
?
Your comment

Commenting via the web interface is currently disabled.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 74291@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 74291
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch