mailutils-3.10 test phase

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
3 participants
  • Leo Famulari
  • zimoun
  • Vladimir K
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Vladimir K
Severity
normal
V
V
Vladimir K wrote on 31 Aug 2020 09:18
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
CALR2pRyq5xwQYaXyohpFqdqBhiAC4r85pNZ_zkJ1Xm6r996k6g@mail.gmail.com
Hi!
Get the error while building emacs dependency.
## ---------------- ##
## Tested programs. ##
## ---------------- ##

## ------------------ ##
## Running the tests. ##
## ------------------ ##
testsuite: starting at: Mon Aug 31 23:51:19 UTC 2020
1. cwdrepl tool (cwdrepl.at:17): ok (0m0.014s 0m0.010s)
2. mockmail (mockmail.at:17): ok (0m0.022s 0m0.019s)
3. mockmta (mockmta.at:17): skipped (mockmta.at:18)
testsuite: ending at: Mon Aug 31 23:51:19 UTC 2020
testsuite: test suite duration: 0h 0m 0s

## ------------- ##
## Test results. ##
## ------------- ##

2 tests were successful.
1 test was skipped.

command "make" "check" failed with status 2
Attachment: file
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 13 Dec 2020 21:37
(name . Vladimir K)(address . zjgkkn@gmail.com)(address . 43130@debbugs.gnu.org)
X9Z7f27IW8oJon52@jasmine.lan
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 01:18:32PM +0600, Vladimir K wrote:
Toggle quote (25 lines)
> Hi!
> Get the error while building emacs dependency.
> ## ---------------- ##
> ## Tested programs. ##
> ## ---------------- ##
>
> ## ------------------ ##
> ## Running the tests. ##
> ## ------------------ ##
> testsuite: starting at: Mon Aug 31 23:51:19 UTC 2020
> 1. cwdrepl tool (cwdrepl.at:17): ok (0m0.014s 0m0.010s)
> 2. mockmail (mockmail.at:17): ok (0m0.022s 0m0.019s)
> 3. mockmta (mockmta.at:17): skipped (mockmta.at:18)
> testsuite: ending at: Mon Aug 31 23:51:19 UTC 2020
> testsuite: test suite duration: 0h 0m 0s
>
> ## ------------- ##
> ## Test results. ##
> ## ------------- ##
>
> 2 tests were successful.
> 1 test was skipped.
>
> command "make" "check" failed with status 2

Hm, I don't see where it failed?

The package appears to build successfully now. Are you still having
trouble with it?
Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 5 Jul 2021 10:56
(name . Leo Famulari)(address . leo@famulari.name)
87r1gdkukn.fsf@gmail.com
Hi Vladimir,

On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 15:37, Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:
Toggle quote (16 lines)
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 01:18:32PM +0600, Vladimir K wrote:

>> ## ------------- ##
>> ## Test results. ##
>> ## ------------- ##
>>
>> 2 tests were successful.
>> 1 test was skipped.
>>
>> command "make" "check" failed with status 2
>
> Hm, I don't see where it failed?
>
> The package appears to build successfully now. Are you still having
> trouble with it?

Using Guix 3694c0d, it builds fine on x86_64 and

guix build --no-grafts --system=i686-linux mailutils

also builds fine. What is your arch? Do you still have the issue?


All the best,
simon
Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 5 Jul 2021 10:56
control message for bug #43130
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
87pmvxkuki.fsf@gmail.com
tags 43130 + moreinfo
quit
Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 14 Sep 2021 12:29
Re: bug#43130: mailutils-3.10 test phase
(name . Leo Famulari)(address . leo@famulari.name)
86a6kfv4ay.fsf@gmail.com
Hi,

On Mon, 05 Jul 2021 at 10:56, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:
Toggle quote (23 lines)
> On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 15:37, Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 01:18:32PM +0600, Vladimir K wrote:
>
>>> ## ------------- ##
>>> ## Test results. ##
>>> ## ------------- ##
>>>
>>> 2 tests were successful.
>>> 1 test was skipped.
>>>
>>> command "make" "check" failed with status 2
>>
>> Hm, I don't see where it failed?
>>
>> The package appears to build successfully now. Are you still having
>> trouble with it?
>
> Using Guix 3694c0d, it builds fine on x86_64 and
>
> guix build --no-grafts --system=i686-linux mailutils
>
> also builds fine. What is your arch? Do you still have the issue?

After 10 weeks asking moreinfo, I am closing. Feel free to reopen if I
miss a point.


All the best,
simon
Closed
?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 43130@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 43130
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch