Guix fails to build libreoffice

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
4 participants
  • Jesse Gibbons
  • Ludovic Courtès
  • Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
  • Jan Wielkiewicz
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Jan Wielkiewicz
Severity
normal
J
J
Jan Wielkiewicz wrote on 22 Sep 2019 18:52
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
20190922185206.3ed64af4@interia.pl
Hi everyone!

I've recently tried to reconfigure my system, but after about 3 hours
of building libreoffice, the system froze for 2 hours and then guix
threw:

- 'build' phasebuilder for
`/gnu/store/ndibmh084iqmhv1ldv3fr3380mfk6qzg-libreoffice-6.1.5.2.drv'
failed with exit code 1 build
of /gnu/store/ndibmh084iqmhv1ldv3fr3380mfk6qzg-libreoffice-6.1.5.2.drv
failed View build log at
'/var/log/guix/drvs/nd/ibmh084iqmhv1ldv3fr3380mfk6qzg-libreoffice-6.1.5.2.drv.bz2'.
guix system: error: build of
`/gnu/store/ndibmh084iqmhv1ldv3fr3380mfk6qzg-libreoffice-6.1.5.2.drv'
failed

My system is an old ThinkPad with 2GB of RAM and Intel Centrino Duo
processor, but I'm unsure if this was the cause of the build failing.
I saw some other packages have similar problems like, if my memory is
correct, the support for ARM have been removed from webkit-qt.
I'm not sure if removing support for an achitecture is the right
solution here - wouldn't it be better if Guix checked if the system is
powerful enough to handle building certain packages?

Here's the part of the log where it fails:

[build CXX] sc/source/core/data/colcontainer.cxx
[build CXX] sc/source/core/data/column.cxx
[build CXX] sc/source/core/data/column2.cxx
[build CXX] sc/source/core/data/column3.cxx
g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions.
make[1]: ***
[/tmp/guix-build-libreoffice-6.1.5.2.drv-0/libreoffice-6.1.5.2/solenv/gbuild/LinkTarget.mk:293: /tmp/guix-build-libreoffice-6.1.5.2.drv-0/libreoffice-6.1.5.2/workdir/CxxObject/sc/source/core/data/column2.o] Error 4
make[1]: *** Deleting file
'/tmp/guix-build-libreoffice-6.1.5.2.drv-0/libreoffice-6.1.5.2/workdir/CxxObject/sc/source/core/data/column2.o'
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make: *** [Makefile:286: build] Error 2
Backtrace:
4 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/8d49s04zpk9frpz9isawr8k4fma…")
In ice-9/eval.scm:
191:35 3 (_ _)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
863:16 2 (every1 #<procedure 5073a0 at /gnu/store/0npakqh7q9kfi…> …)
In /gnu/store/0npakqh7q9kfik8y0cc0vjqqpvnyv2h1-module-import/guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm:
799:28 1 (_ _)
In /gnu/store/0npakqh7q9kfik8y0cc0vjqqpvnyv2h1-module-import/guix/build/utils.scm:
616:6 0 (invoke _ . _)

/gnu/store/0npakqh7q9kfik8y0cc0vjqqpvnyv2h1-module-import/guix/build/utils.scm:616:6:
In procedure invoke:
Throw to key `srfi-34' with args `(#<condition &invoke-error [program:
"make" arguments: ("-j" "2" "build-nocheck") exit-status: 2
term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f] 491200>)'.

---
Jan Wielkiewicz
T
T
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote on 22 Sep 2019 19:45
8736gorzqn.fsf@nckx
Jan,

Thanks for the report, and sorry you had to learn this the hard
way.

Jan Wielkiewicz ???
Toggle quote (6 lines)
> I've recently tried to reconfigure my system, but after about 3
> hours
> of building libreoffice, the system froze for 2 hours and then
> guix
> threw:

[…]

Toggle quote (5 lines)
> g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.

This message and the freezing above is a tell-tale sign of OOM
(out-of-memory). If you check your dmesg or /var/log/messages at
that time, I'm almost certain you'll see the OOM killer plot its
dastardly deeds.

Toggle quote (5 lines)
> My system is an old ThinkPad with 2GB of RAM and Intel Centrino
> Duo
> processor, but I'm unsure if this was the cause of the build
> failing.

You may be sure.

2 GiB of RAM is simply not enough to build many packages these
days. That's the world we live in. There's nothing Guix can do
to change that.

You can restrict the number of parallel builds and jobs by
respectively passing --max-jobs=1 and --cores=1 to the daemon.
You can make this permanent by setting (extra-options …) in your
system configuration.

Even then, some complex executables will simply fail to link with
so little RAM.

Toggle quote (4 lines)
> I saw some other packages have similar problems like, if my
> memory is
> correct, the support for ARM have been removed from webkit-qt.

I don't see how this is related to running out of RAM. If
webkit-qt is broken on ARM that's unfortunate, but it's better to
mark it as such than failing to build it on 100% of ARM systems.

Your issue is different: the exact same libreoffice might have
built fine if you had 4 GiB of RAM, or 3, or 5, or 2 with swap,
but only if your weren't also running any (Guix or other) builds
at the time, or watching a movie, or had the room thermostat
turned up, or use Gnome 3, all beneath a gibbous moon. All these
things, and many more, will cause builds to fail or succeed
‘randomly’.

The only way to know is to try.

Toggle quote (5 lines)
> I'm not sure if removing support for an achitecture is the right
> solution here - wouldn't it be better if Guix checked if the
> system is
> powerful enough to handle building certain packages?

I personally think the annoyances of ‘helpful’ warnings
(=extremely inaccurate guesses) would far outweigh any purported
benefit.

Kind regards,

T G-R
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ui78
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

J
J
Jesse Gibbons wrote on 22 Sep 2019 20:28
db7edec055f648e5d94f43afd0c8b8a72b66737a.camel@gmail.com
On Sun, 2019-09-22 at 19:45 +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for
GNU Guix wrote:
Toggle quote (43 lines)
> Jan,
>
> Thanks for the report, and sorry you had to learn this the hard
> way.
>
> Jan Wielkiewicz ???
> > I've recently tried to reconfigure my system, but after about 3
> > hours
> > of building libreoffice, the system froze for 2 hours and then
> > guix
> > threw:
>
> […]
>
> > g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)
> > Please submit a full bug report,
> > with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> > See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
>
> This message and the freezing above is a tell-tale sign of OOM
> (out-of-memory). If you check your dmesg or /var/log/messages at
> that time, I'm almost certain you'll see the OOM killer plot its
> dastardly deeds.
>
> > My system is an old ThinkPad with 2GB of RAM and Intel Centrino
> > Duo
> > processor, but I'm unsure if this was the cause of the build
> > failing.
>
> You may be sure.
>
> 2 GiB of RAM is simply not enough to build many packages these
> days. That's the world we live in. There's nothing Guix can do
> to change that.
>
> You can restrict the number of parallel builds and jobs by
> respectively passing --max-jobs=1 and --cores=1 to the daemon.
> You can make this permanent by setting (extra-options …) in your
> system configuration.
>
> Even then, some complex executables will simply fail to link with
> so little RAM.

You can get around too little RAM by using swap, correct? Partition ~8GB as
swap and add (swap-devices) in the configuration.
T
T
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote on 22 Sep 2019 20:41
(name . Jesse Gibbons)(address . jgibbons2357@gmail.com)
871rw8rx65.fsf@nckx
Jesse Gibbons ???
Toggle quote (8 lines)
>> Even then, some complex executables will simply fail to link
>> with
>> so little RAM.
>
> You can get around too little RAM by using swap, correct?
> Partition ~8GB as
> swap and add (swap-devices) in the configuration.

Sure, I think I suggested that (I was serious about Gnome, too!).
People tend to underestimate just how slow swap is by several
orders of magnitude, though.

Not sure about LibreOffice, but I doubt you'll have much luck
building, say, Chromium with 2 GiB of physical RAM, with or
without swap — but I admit I haven't been crazy enough to try :-)

Another hack you can try is enabling 50% zstd zswap, but with 2
GiB of RAM and such an old CPU that too is far out in diminishing
returns territory. It could just crash your kernel.

Kind regards,

T G-R
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=lAPU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

T
T
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote on 22 Sep 2019 20:44
(name . Jesse Gibbons)(address . jgibbons2357@gmail.com)
87zhiwqigo.fsf@nckx
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice ???
Toggle quote (3 lines)
> People tend to underestimate just how slow swap is by several
> orders of magnitude, though.

Or just how quickly it can destroy an SSD.

Kind regards,

T G-R
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Pug+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

J
(name . Tobias Geerinckx-Rice)(address . me@tobias.gr)(address . 37482@debbugs.gnu.org)
20190923024535.39385299@kompiuter
On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 19:45:52 +0200
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr> wrote:

Toggle quote (4 lines)
> 2 GiB of RAM is simply not enough to build many packages these
> days. That's the world we live in. There's nothing Guix can do
> to change that.

Sad, guess I have to buy more RAM.

Toggle quote (5 lines)
> You can restrict the number of parallel builds and jobs by
> respectively passing --max-jobs=1 and --cores=1 to the daemon.
> You can make this permanent by setting (extra-options …) in your
> system configuration.

Cool, didn't know about this option.

Toggle quote (11 lines)
> Even then, some complex executables will simply fail to link with
> so little RAM.
>
> Your issue is different: the exact same libreoffice might have
> built fine if you had 4 GiB of RAM, or 3, or 5, or 2 with swap,
> but only if your weren't also running any (Guix or other) builds
> at the time, or watching a movie, or had the room thermostat
> turned up, or use Gnome 3, all beneath a gibbous moon. All these
> things, and many more, will cause builds to fail or succeed
> ‘randomly’.

I actually have a 10GB sized swap file created on an SSD and
defined in the config.scm, but it didn't help. I'm also using Mate, but
I can try without any DE. The only two things running in the background
were Mate, mate terminal, Guix and %desktop-services.

Toggle quote (8 lines)
> I personally think the annoyances of ‘helpful’ warnings
> (=extremely inaccurate guesses) would far outweigh any purported
> benefit.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> T G-R

Is there a way to skip building libreoffice, if the substitute isn't
available?

Toggle quote (2 lines)
>Or just how quickly it can destroy an SSD.

Even more fun... Waiting for a powerful libre computer from from the
ground, because running on old ThinkPads forever isn't the right
solution.


Thanks for explanations and help,

Jan Wielkiewicz
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 26 Sep 2019 22:04
(name . Jan)(address . tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl)
87y2yalt7h.fsf@gnu.org
Hello,

Jan <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl> skribis:

Toggle quote (3 lines)
> Is there a way to skip building libreoffice, if the substitute isn't
> available?

There’s no way to skip it. However, there are a couple of tricks:

• The ‘--dry-run’ option always shows what would be built or
downloaded, so you can run, say, ‘guix upgrade --dry-run’ and see if
libreoffice is among the things that would be built.

• You can do ‘guix package -u . --do-not-upgrade=libreoffice’ to
upgrade everything but packages whose name contains “libreoffice”.

HTH!

Ludo’.
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 26 Sep 2019 22:05
control message for bug #37482
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
87wodult6v.fsf@gnu.org
tags 37482 notabug
close 37482
quit
J
Re: bug#37482: Guix fails to build libreoffice
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)
20190927200254.50801048@kompiuter
On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 22:04:50 +0200
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

Toggle quote (1 lines)
> There’s no way to skip it. However, there are a couple of tricks:
What about adding an option to only download substitutes for older
devices? I saw someone talking about such feature on the mailing list,
don't know where exactly though.

Toggle quote (7 lines)
> • The ‘--dry-run’ option always shows what would be built or
> downloaded, so you can run, say, ‘guix upgrade --dry-run’ and see
> if libreoffice is among the things that would be built.
>
> • You can do ‘guix package -u . --do-not-upgrade=libreoffice’ to
> upgrade everything but packages whose name contains “libreoffice”.

Will use these options next time, thanks for the info.


Jan Wielkiewicz
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 28 Sep 2019 11:31
(name . Jan)(address . tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl)
875zlc22eh.fsf@gnu.org
Hello,

Jan <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl> skribis:

Toggle quote (7 lines)
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 22:04:50 +0200
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> There’s no way to skip it. However, there are a couple of tricks:
> What about adding an option to only download substitutes for older
> devices?

That’s not possible in the general case. Also, it would be problematic
security-wise because you could easily find yourself installing older
versions with known vulnerabilities.

Thanks,
Ludo’.
?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 37482@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 37482
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch